Japan of July 7 Incident of 1937 is in native's eyes " L History " R
In fact, before making war, the face-off of two armies in China and Japan has been already at swords' points. This is that the Japanese aggressor troop surrounds the scene in the military camp of the stationed army of Fengtai of China at the time of Fengtai incident. The machine gun is right, it is the camp door of Chinese armed forces. In the view of Japanese aggressor troop, this is a normal and essential measure at that time. Does not know if in Japan, Chinese armed forces uses the machine gun and facing toward the door of military camp on day like this, whether they will think too " L Normal and essential" .
Though has already seldom seen the relevant literature of the July 7 Incident of 1937 on Japanese Volkswagen media today, in fact the historical educational circles of Japan, invested quite a lot of energy to carry on research to the July 7 Incident of 1937 over the years. In this kind of research, Japanese side has reflected certain introspection attitude too, for example, NHK editor>In the 21st part, have appraised the July 7 Incident of 1937 like this - -" At clear and seventh evening of the seventh moon in lunarcalendar night of 12 years, the side of Lugou Qiao was shot, Japan fell into the biggest mire since the dawn of human civilization. " L However, this kind of research, there is the obvious area " R The history study characteristic of Japan " .
So-called " L The history study characteristic of Japan " ,It is in this kind of research, there is serious tendentiousness on choice tape of the historical data, so the result studied is right " L History of reappearing is true " R Whether helpful and difficult weigh, but can find out the obvious one to the meaning that the war crime was absolved at that time in Japan.
For example, as to the reason of the July 7 Incident of 1937, the research of Japanese side focuses on the process of the concrete incident, even precise as to the tendencies of minute and every soldier, just the conclusion is complicated and confusing. Their research achievement, mainly concentrate on explaining several following points:
First, Lugouqiao Incident the intersection of Japan and premeditation, they emphasize beginning of incident stationed the intersection of Japanese aggressor troop and North China army's manoeuvre army lose a soldier (and then rejoin the unit) really ,Belong to " L Wipe rifles and cock off " . Behind the view, to say the intersection of Japan and the intersection of invasion and war in China, plan naturally beforehand to some extent, but because the incident initiates .
Second, history study of Japan rack one's brains, analyze Lugouqiao Incident have all sorts of of China work for secretly behind one's back. Propose Japanese soldier has been facilitated on purpose and fought with the Japanese aggressor troop out of a certain purpose by China after losing, there is this " L China is to the shooting of Japanese side after the soldier loses " , " As if the money of flat garrison troop is Communist Party while shaking, provoke the Sino-Japanese war with the Japanese aggressor troop fight on purpose " , " Lose whom soldier find just after being at the beginning of fighting " R Wait for many kinds of statements, and have varied evidences one by one seemingly.
However, in fact these views are not all worth a barge, quote the materials that Japan's history study kept unintentionally, can refute these views easily. Lost in the World War when a soldier initiates two countries, just as that press the trigger and send out the fatal bullet, the question is not pressing the movements of the trigger, there are bullets early to but lain in the rifle, and aim at the goal. See Japan invade activity while being a series of to the intersection of China and the Northeast, Rehe, Inner Mongol, North China in front of the incident, will find out easily, Japan attempts to capture North China, it is a orderly plan activity, it is just morning and evening in time to be bad.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment