Wednesday, October 31, 2012

See drops of tooth cost over thousands of patient tell hospital make a diagnosis claim excessively

See drops of tooth cost over thousands of patient, tell hospital make a diagnosis claim excessively
Patient turn sour, reach hospital think tooth because of tooth, spend the hospitalization cost of over thousands of yuan unexpectedly for a tooth. Today the court of Haidian reveals, patient Ms Zhang cures three institute Shangdi clinic Co., Ltd.s in the north to tell to the court on the grounds of swindling consumers, require this hospital to be double and return 2000 hospitalization costs Yu Yuan. The court has already accepted this case at present .
The intersection of plaintiff and Ms Zhang tell, claim will it be the beginning June she because two the intersection of tooth and acid ache eat, then go to the institute clinic of Shangdi of north medicine three to see the tooth . Doctor tell oneself need, fill a tooth first, one 160, and then say, take again " L Kill " R Nerve, and say that there is a hole on the tooth.
Ms Zhang claims, original she herself has not found that there are holes, because of this hole on the tooth, successively looked at a tooth in the hospital twice, it adds up to 1261.2 yuan to cost. But because the tooth mended is not still good, afterwards when she goes to another hospital to see the second tooth, but the doctor says tooth and nerve are all good, just irritated, using can resume to defend the irritated toothpaste in one or two months, but if " L Kill " R The nerve needs to spend 500 About yuan.
The plaintiff thinks, in the course of making a diagnosis, the institute doctor of north medicine three utilizes the patient to be ignorant of medical treatment, called hole bored as the patient original hole on the tooth, also went on unnecessarily " L Kill " R Neural treatment, it is the obvious fraud of excessively making a diagnosis. According to the regulation of Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interests, the compensation own loss that should be doubles. At present, this case is in further trying.
|

0 comments:

Post a Comment